On the way to work this morning I felt really comfortable sitting in my car. The ergonomic design of my car makes driving a pleasure, but this wasn't the reason why I was feeling comfortable.
The answer is simple. I felt safe. Safe because the car I was driving is a safe car. A car that has been put through tests by independent experts to make sure it adhered to minimum safety standards. But there's more. Meeting minimum safety standards isn't the end goal for automakers in Europe.They want customers to know that their models are amongst the best in class. This creates a competitive, transparent market, where safety information is in the public domain.
It is not the same everywhere. Not every person has the same opportunities as me to drive a safe car as standard and feel comfortable. A new piece of research by safety charity Global NCAP, which promotes and conducts independent research and testing programmes to assess the safety and environmental characteristics of cars, shone a bright safety light on some of India's most popular and new models.
The results make uncomfortable reading. The Renault Kwid, Maruti Suzuki Celerio, Maruti Suzuki Eeco, Mahindra Scorpio and Hyundai Eon all showed low levels of adult occupant protection. As an illustration: the Kwid was tested in three versions, including one with airbags, but each was rated as zero star for adult safety. Renault came in for criticism from David Ward, Secretary General of Global NCAP.
“The latest SaferCarsforIndia results show how important it is for cars to have a body shell that can remain stable in a crash. This is an absolutely crucial pre-requisite for occupant safety together with fitment at least of front air bags. It is surprising that a manufacturer like Renault introduced the Kwid initially lacking this essential feature," he said.
I imagine that Ward's comments made Renault executives feel rather uncomfortable. He didn't stop there. "Global NCAP strongly believes that no manufacturer anywhere in the world should be developing new models that are so clearly sub-standard."
What do you think? Should there be minimum global standards that automaker should adhere too? What should they be and how would they be enforced? There are a couple of other points for the fleet community to think about here too
Firstly, in emerging markets, fleet leaders struggle to get information. So independent testing from reputable bodies has a value in our fleet decision making. This data is worth sharing with colleagues around the world about anything to do with cars in that market has a value. Here's the link to share with your fleet colleagues working in Asia.
Secondly, this time it is a question, should we, as a fleet community, be pressing manufacturers to sign up to minimum voluntary safety standards? A tough questions, but safety is a tough issue.
Who? Become a voice of the fleet community and influence the future of global fleet management. This is the place where fleet professionals can share views, opinions, trends and more with the rest of the fleet community. Whether you are a fleet manager, business owner, consultant or supplier, you can launch your own blog. As a Fleet Europe contributor, we expect a strict non-sales policy. Contact us !